[debexpo-devel] Considerations about email addresses/features

Jonny Lamb jonnylamb at jonnylamb.com
Thu Jun 5 03:48:52 CEST 2008


On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 06:12:41PM +0200, Christoph Haas wrote:
> Now I see it, too. :) Yes, indeed. People accidentally uploaded other 
> people's packages which lead to confusion. At first I started with a 
> blacklist but that didn't quite cut it. So I relied on the PGP signature 
> and have a keyring running (which is also very troublesome due to 
> permissions given to the web server).

I see. I think that's a little tiresome, and perhaps pointless to
provide for users.. I'm all for simply relying on the HTTP
authentication credentials then, to simplify things. Does anyone
have any problems with this?

Thanks,

-- 
Jonny Lamb, UK                                   jonnylamb at jonnylamb.com
http://jonnylamb.com                                     GPG: 0x2E039402
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
Url : http://workaround.org/pipermail/debexpo-devel/attachments/20080605/e1d6dea4/attachment.pgp 


More information about the debexpo-devel mailing list